The Law To Know

← All thinkers

19th and 20th centuries

Ronald Dworkin

1931–2013 · United States and United Kingdom · Professor of jurisprudence at Oxford and New York University

Spotted a mistake? Tell us.

Read this first. These are short summaries of large lives and bodies of work, chosen to give a first map of legal thought, not a ranking. Dates are the standard ones, with 'c.' or 'active' where they are uncertain. We paraphrase and never quote, and each summary simplifies. Read the original works before you cite anyone. This is general information, not legal advice.

1800 BCAD 2000

Life and ideas

Ronald Dworkin was an American philosopher who taught at Yale, then at Oxford, where he succeeded Hart as Professor of Jurisprudence in 1969, and at New York University. In 'The Model of Rules' (1967) and Taking Rights Seriously (1977) he attacked Hart's positivism, arguing that judges decide hard cases by principles, such as that no one may profit from their own wrong, which are not identified by their pedigree but by their moral weight. Individual rights, he said, are 'trumps' against collective goals. In Law's Empire (1986) he argued that law is an interpretive practice: the judge, like a novelist adding a chapter to a chain novel, must find the reading that best fits the record and puts it in its best moral light. He also wrote on equality, free speech, abortion and the Constitution.

The big idea

Judges decide hard cases by principles as well as rules, and a judge should seek the interpretation that best fits and justifies the legal practice. Rights are 'trumps' against majority preferences.

Main work

Taking Rights Seriously (1977); Law's Empire (1986)

Legacy

Hart's principal critic and the most influential rights theorist of his time.

The school of thought

← Earlier: Ronald CoaseLater: John Finnis →

See everyone on the timeline and compare thinkers side by side

Take it further

Support this free tool

This guide is free, and it takes a lot of careful work to build and keep up to date. If it helped you, you can leave a small contribution. No account is needed, and nothing is sold to you.

A one-time card payment through Stripe. It is a contribution, not a purchase, and it is not tax-deductible.

TheLawToKnow Tools’s founders of legal thought is an educational overview. It is not legal advice. Report a mistake.