The Law To Know

← All thinkers

19th and 20th centuries

Lon L. Fuller

1902–1978 · United States · Jurist and professor

Spotted a mistake? Tell us.

Read this first. These are short summaries of large lives and bodies of work, chosen to give a first map of legal thought, not a ranking. Dates are the standard ones, with 'c.' or 'active' where they are uncertain. We paraphrase and never quote, and each summary simplifies. Read the original works before you cite anyone. This is general information, not legal advice.

1800 BCAD 2000

Life and ideas

Lon Fuller taught at Harvard, where he became a leading scholar of contract and of the philosophy of law. In 1958 he answered H.L.A. Hart's defence of the separation of law and morals in the Harvard Law Review, using the problem of the Nazi-era informer to show why a legal system cannot be morally neutral. His book The Morality of Law (1964) sets out eight principles of an 'inner morality' of law: laws must be general, public, not retroactive, clear, not contradictory, possible to obey, reasonably constant and actually applied as announced. A system that fails them all, he said, is not merely bad law but no law at all. He thought of this as a procedural natural law, an inner morality that makes law a purposive activity. He also wrote the classic teaching case of the speluncean explorers.

The big idea

Law has an 'inner morality' of eight principles, such as generality, publicity, clarity and non-retroactivity. A system that ignores them all fails to be law at all.

Main work

The Morality of Law (1964)

Legacy

The leading modern theory of procedural natural law, and Hart's opponent in the famous debate.

The school of thought

  • Natural Law Theory: Law gets its force from morality: a gravely unjust rule is not truly law, or not fully law.
← Earlier: Karl LlewellynLater: H.L.A. Hart →

See everyone on the timeline and compare thinkers side by side

Take it further

Support this free tool

This guide is free, and it takes a lot of careful work to build and keep up to date. If it helped you, you can leave a small contribution. No account is needed, and nothing is sold to you.

A one-time card payment through Stripe. It is a contribution, not a purchase, and it is not tax-deductible.

TheLawToKnow Tools’s founders of legal thought is an educational overview. It is not legal advice. Report a mistake.